Re: Optimize SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn: use in-place compaction instead of temporary array
| От | Xuneng Zhou |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Optimize SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn: use in-place compaction instead of temporary array |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABPTF7UKaXP+1-jMg7yXWrj+C07ZvDitDpLF6UeCQUAFGO4nYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Optimize SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn: use in-place compaction instead of temporary array (Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Optimize SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn: use in-place compaction instead of temporary array
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Neil, On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:49 PM Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Xuneng, > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:15 PM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> v3-0001 fixes a critical issue where the snapshot->xip array in >> SnapBuildBuildSnapshot might not be sorted before reaching the >> consistent state. Sorry for the noise here. >> > > I’ve given this patch a cursory review, and it looks good overall. > Considering the impact of this change, should we add a regression test for it, or provide a unit test to ensure the correctnessof the modification? > I think it would be more receptive to merging such a "subtle performance optimization" only when its correctness is fullyguaranteed. Thanks for your review. I think we can add a tap test for it. -- Best, Xuneng
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: