Re: Confusing long option in pg_receivexlog/basebackup/dumpall

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: Confusing long option in pg_receivexlog/basebackup/dumpall
Дата
Msg-id CABOikdN+QT_jLDVZL-P1HRf2X+xvXzZXVuYU3G84wa-raH+JvQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confusing long option in pg_receivexlog/basebackup/dumpall  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения



On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:



In other tools too, like psql, you can pass a connection string with -d/--dbname, which is why I thought it would be best to use the same option for passing a connection string to pg_basebackup/pg_dumpall too.


Ah Ok. I was not aware that you can also pass a connection string to psql with -d option. That way it looks consistent though still confusing.
 
See discussion at http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/512520FE.6050701@vmware.com. If you have any better ideas, I'm all ears...


No, I don't have better ideas. I was worried that it was an oversight. But now I know it was chosen this way after a careful consideration.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something?
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something?