On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Looks good as far as it goes, but I wonder whether any of the other
> get_slot_xmins calls need polling too. Don't feel a need to add such
> calls until someone exhibits a failure there, but I won't be very
> surprised if someone does.
I got the same thought, wondering as well if get_slot_xmins should be
renamed check_slot_xmins with the is() tests moved inside it as well.
Not sure if that's worth the API ugliness though.
> Anyway, pushed this patch with minor editing. Thanks!
Thanks.
--
Michael