Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTn_yuFwpK+qHJswP1bG_KbE68=jY-w6i7sLVyS+yDYbg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-01-25 12:26:21 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c b/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c
>> index 083c0303dc..2eb3a420ac 100644
>> --- a/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c
>> +++ b/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c
>> @@ -629,6 +629,14 @@ TupleDescInitBuiltinEntry(TupleDesc desc,
>>                       att->attstorage = 'p';
>>                       att->attcollation = InvalidOid;
>>                       break;
>> +
>> +             case INT8OID:
>> +                     att->attlen = 8;
>> +                     att->attbyval = true;
>> +                     att->attalign = 'd';
>> +                     att->attstorage = 'p';
>> +                     att->attcollation = InvalidOid;
>> +                     break;
>>       }
>>  }
>
> INT8 isn't unconditionally byval, is it?

Doh. Of course.

>>       /* slot_name */
>> -     len = strlen(NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name));
>> -     pq_sendint(&buf, len, 4);       /* col1 len */
>> -     pq_sendbytes(&buf, NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name), len);
>> +     values[0] = PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text(NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name)));
>
> That seems a bit long.

Sure. What about that:
-   len = strlen(NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name));
-   pq_sendint(&buf, len, 4);   /* col1 len */
-   pq_sendbytes(&buf, NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name), len);
+   slot_name = NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name);
+   values[0] = PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text(slot_name));

> I've not done like the most careful review ever, but I'm in favor of the
> general change (provided the byval thing is fixed obviously).

Thanks for the review.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Allow interrupts on waiting standby
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans