Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTUYRSFCgRmcktgrzd+dcEcDw5DR3=uEHmS8_wDQjRuTQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> We could also do this by loading a C module during the regression
> tests, which seems maybe less ugly than adding a GUC.
> I don't particularly like your suggestion of spooky action at a
> distance between force_parallel_mode and regression_test_mode.  That
> just seems kooky.

One downside of the plugin is that any users willing to do make
installcheck would need to install it as well.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RecoveryTargetTLI dead variable in XLogCtlData