Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTSvSKhOFWNtKxx6ju29N30-V0EEaQQLrxkuuakfW-QBQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-12-08 20:09 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Michael Paquier
>> > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Thanks, I looked at that again and problem is fixed as attached.
>> >
>> > Er, not exactly... poll_query_until in PostgresNode.pm is using psql
>> > -c without the --no-psqlrc switch so this patch causes the regression
>> > tests of pg_rewind to fail. Fixed as attached.
>>
>> Committed.  Go, team.
>>
>> This has been a long time coming.
>
>
> great, thank you very much you and all

Thanks! This is now marked as committed in the CF app...
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgresNode::_update_pid using undefined variables in tap tests
Следующее
От: FattahRozzaq
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HELP!!! The WAL Archive is taking up all space