On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have any more inputs on this patch and it looks good to me.
> So, I'm moving the status to ready for committer.
Thanks!
>> At some point it would really make sense to group all things under the
>> same banner (64-b LO, pg_basebackup, and now pg_rewind).
>>
> +1. Implementation-wise, I prefer pg_recvint64 to fe_recvint64.
So do I. That's a matter of taste I guess.
--
Michael