On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I don't have a good solution for this problem so far.
> We might need to improve group locking mechanism for the updating
> operation or came up with another approach to resolve this problem.
> For example, one possible idea is that the launcher process allocates
> vm and fsm enough in advance in order to avoid extending fork relation
> by parallel workers, but it's not resolve fundamental problem.
Marked as returned with feedback because of lack of activity and...
Feedback provided.
--
Michael