On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Gavin Flower wrote:
>
>> possibly '--nosync' (& any similar) should have a '--no-sync' variation
>> added, with the '--nosync' variation documented as depreciated?
>
> I agree -- I would go as far as just documenting --no-sync only and
> keeping the --nosync one working with minimal (if any) visibility in
> docs.
Keeping no visibility at all in the docs, with an alias in the
binaries sounds fine to me if we want to standardize a bit more
things.
--
Michael