Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSa4p+tVpfXRHoV-Ex2DA46SzYNdNoa+GXCWvSz=x3G8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers  (Rick Otten <rottenwindfish@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
>> There is already a "Parallel Worker" memory context defined by that
>> time.  I think the issue is that multicorn library expects that
>> Transaction context to be defined by that time.
>
> It looks like multicorn supposes that a library's _PG_init function can
> only be called inside a transaction.  That is broken with a capital B.
> We need not consider parallel query to find counterexamples: that
> means you can't preload multicorn using shared_preload_libraries,
> as that loads libraries into the postmaster, which never has and never
> will run transactions.
>
> Whatever it's trying to initialize in _PG_init needs to be done later.

Indeed, that's bad. I am adding in CC Ronan who has been working on
multicorn. At this stage, I think that you would be better out by
disabling parallelism.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
Следующее
От: "Daniel Verite"
Дата:
Сообщение: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values