Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size)

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 8/29/17 20:36, Andres Freund wrote:
>> So the question is whether we want {max,min}_wal_size be sized in
>> multiples of segment sizes or as a proper byte size.  I'm leaning
>> towards the latter.
>
> I'm not sure what the question is or what its impact would be.

FWIW, I get the question as: do we want the in-memory values of
min/max_wal_size to be calculated in MB (which is now the case) or
just bytes. Andres tends for using bytes.
-- 
Michael