Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRmC7t=wyJO7L8pzQeZ+38_8Owyr1QzZfZ+FbzNHUjQpg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> In the hope of making things better in 10.0, I remove my objection. If
> people want to use wal_level = minimal they can restart their server
> and they can find that out in the release notes.
>
> Should we set wal_level = replica or wal_level = logical as the
> default for 10.0?

replica sounds like a better default to me as most users use at least
archiving. Logical decoding is still fresh though, and its use is not
that wide. Have there been any study on its performance impact
compared to replica by the way?
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rahila Syed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Assignment of valid collation for SET operations onqueries with UNKNOWN types.
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Supporting huge pages on Windows