On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-26 21:07:20 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> One thing we could do, since all catalog updates now go through
>> CatalogTupleUpdate(), is not use simple_heap_update() there but do the
>> heap_update() directly and provide a better user-facing error message.
>
> I think it's unacceptable to regress with an error message here. I've
> seen sequence DDL being used while concurrent DML was onging in a number
> of production use cases, and just starting to error out instead of
> properly blocking doesn't seem acceptable to me.
+1'ing on this argument.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs