Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRAJ+wXrDPEydfO6x_duuPYOdJhTPyueboiwGPHwjwYJg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (David Rowley <dgrowley@gmail.com>)
Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm thinks.
>
> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.

All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)
Следующее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX