Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
| От | Andrew Gierth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 874mpdehka.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> So wouldn't it make more sense to move these definitions into c.h and>>> standardize their usage? Petr> I was thinking the same when I've seen Peter's version of NumericPetr> abbreviations patch. So +1 for that. Hm, it looks like the same could be said for INT32_MIN and _MAX; some places use INT_MIN etc., others say "we shouldn't assume int = int32" and use (-0x7fffffff - 1) or whatever instead. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: