On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Given a tuple, verify whether the given Xmax matches the tuple's Xmin,
>> + * taking into account that the Xmin might have been frozen.
>> + */
>> [...]
>> + /*
>> + * We actually don't know if there's a match, but if the previous tuple
>> + * was frozen, we cannot really rely on a perfect match.
>> + */
>
> I don't know what you had in mind here,
Impossible to know if I don't actually send the contents :)
> but I tweaked the 9.3 version so that it now looks like this:
I wanted to mention that the comments could be reworked. And forgot to
suggest some.
> /*
> * HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin - verify update chain xmax/xmin lineage
> *
> * Given the new version of a tuple after some update, verify whether the
> * given Xmax (corresponding to the previous version) matches the tuple's
> * Xmin, taking into account that the Xmin might have been frozen after the
> * update.
> */
> bool
> HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(TransactionId xmax, HeapTupleHeader htup)
> {
> TransactionId xmin = HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(htup);
>
> /*
> * If the xmax of the old tuple is identical to the xmin of the new one,
> * it's a match.
> */
> if (TransactionIdEquals(xmax, xmin))
> return true;
>
> /*
> * When a tuple is frozen, the original Xmin is lost, but we know it's a
> * committed transaction. So unless the Xmax is InvalidXid, we don't
> * know for certain that there is a match, but there may be one; and we
> * must return true so that a HOT chain that is half-frozen can be walked
> * correctly.
> */
> if (TransactionIdEquals(xmin, FrozenTransactionId) &&
> TransactionIdIsValid(xmax))
> return true;
>
> return false;
> }
Those are clearly improvements.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers