On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Michael Paquier
>>>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I would just write "To
>>>>> avoid calling CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS which can happen when releasing a
>>>>> LWLock" and be done with it. There is no point to list a full function
>>>>> dependency list, which could change in the future with static routines
>>>>> of lwlock.c.
>>>
>>> Agreed. Updated the comment.
>>
>> Robert actually liked adding the complete routine list. Let's see what
>> Fujii-san thinks at the end, there is still some time until the next
>> round of minor releases.
>
> What I think is the patch I attached. Thought?
That's OK for me. Thanks.
--
Michael