Re: kqueue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: kqueue
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQq6_TFyPsKEOfcgBZO19t_sMMxXT3zogE1tp4a6G3WQA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: kqueue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> From an OSX laptop with -S, -c 1 and -M prepared (9 runs, removed the
>> three best and three worst):
>> - HEAD: 9356/9343/9369
>> - HEAD + patch: 9433/9413/9461.071168
>> This laptop has a lot of I/O overhead... Still there is a slight
>> improvement here as well. Looking at the progress report, per-second
>> TPS gets easier more frequently into 9500~9600 TPS with the patch. So
>> at least I am seeing something.
>
> Which OSX version exactly?

El Capitan 10.11.6. With -s 20 (300MB) and 1GB of shared_buffers so as
everything is on memory. Actually re-running the tests now with no VMs
around and no apps, I am getting close to 9650~9700TPS with patch, and
9300~9400TPS on HEAD, so that's unlikely only noise.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: kqueue
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: speeding up GIN build with parallel workers