Re: LSN as a recovery target

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: LSN as a recovery target
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQfQSaFf6bk7LU-jnK15ZDHVvngYM+rOrgNWTj40MkZgg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LSN as a recovery target  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: LSN as a recovery target  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2016 at 05:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Everything else looks in good order.
>>
>> Committed. Thanks.
>
> Thanks for the commit!

By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch adding
the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread. Perhaps
that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring
potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind
much. Just that's worth mentioning.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transactional enum additions - was Re: Alter or rename enum value
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autonomous transactions