On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2017-06-12 15:12:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Commit 4b4b680c3d6d8485155d4d4bf0a92d3a874b7a65 (Make backend local
>>> tracking of buffer pins memory efficient., vintage 2014) seems like a
>>> likely culprit here, but I haven't tested.
>>
>> I'm not that sure. As written above, the Assert isn't new, and given
>> this hasn't been reported before, I'm a bit doubtful that it's a general
>> refcount tracking bug. The FPI code has been whacked around more
>> heavily, so it could well be a bug in it somewhere.
>
> Something doing a bisect could just use a VM that puts the standby on
> a tiny partition. I remember seeing this assertion failure some time
> ago on a test deployment, and that was really surprising. I think that
> this may be hiding something, so we should really try to investigate
> more what's wrong here.
I have been playing a bit with the builds and the attached script
triggering out-of-space errors on a standby (adapt to your
environment), and while looking for a good commit, I have found that
this thing is a bit older than the 2014 vintage... Down to the
merge-base of REL9_4_STABLE and REL9_3_STABLE, the assertion failure
is still the same.
The failure is older than even 9.2, for example by testing at the
merge-base of 9.2 and 9.3:
CONTEXT: xlog redo insert(init): rel 1663/16384/16385; tid 181441/1
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(PrivateRefCount[i] == 0)", File: "bufmgr.c",
Line: 1788)
But well this assertion got changed in dcafdbcd.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers