Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQEw9jqG-wSFSyMzi880PXCi1XbpnkVsD2OKyw7Gwt4JQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Tatsuro Yamada <yamada.tatsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Tatsuro Yamada <yamada.tatsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Tatsuro Yamada
<yamada.tatsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Then I have questions.
>
>   * Should we have separate views for them?  Or should both be covered by the
>     same view with some indication of which command (CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL)
>     is actually running?

Using the same view for both, and tell that this is rather VACUUM or
CLUSTER in the view, would be better IMO. Coming up with a name more
generic than pg_stat_progress_cluster may be better though if this
speaks with VACUUM FULL as well, user-facing documentation does not
say that VACUUM FULL is actually CLUSTER.

> I'll add this patch to CF2017-09.
> Any comments or suggestion are welcome.

Nice to see that you are taking the time to implement patches for
upstream, Yamada-san!
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
Следующее
От: Tatsuro Yamada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Minor code improvement to postgresGetForeignPlan