On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've not done like the most careful review ever, but I'm in favor of the
>>> general change (provided the byval thing is fixed obviously).
>>
>> Thanks for the review.
>
> Why not use pg_ltoa and pg_lltoa like the output functions for the datatype do?
No particular reason.
> Might use CStringGetTextDatum(blah) instead of
> PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text(blah)).
Yes, thanks.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers