Re: logical replication restrictions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marcos Pegoraro
Тема Re: logical replication restrictions
Дата
Msg-id CAB-JLwaHuOJXKCpMKNVL2hJJ3XDavNWvHq=7Mdp9EsedpK1z=A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logical replication restrictions  ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
No, I´m talking about that configuration you can have on standby servers
recovery_min_apply_delay = '8h'


oh okay, I think this can be useful in some cases where we want to avoid data loss similar to its use for physical standby. For example, if the user has by mistake truncated the table (or deleted some required data) on the publisher, we can always it from the subscriber if we have such a feature.

Having said that, I am not sure if we can call it a restriction. It is more of a TODO kind of thing. It doesn't sound advisable to me to keep growing the current Restrictions page [1].
It is a new feature. pglogical supports it and it is useful for delayed
secondary server and if, for some business reason, you have to delay when data
is available. There might be other use cases but these are the ones I regularly
heard from customers.

BTW, I have a WIP patch for this feature. I didn't have enough time to post it
because it lacks documentation and tests. I'm planning to do it as soon as this
CF ends.

Fine, let me know if you need any help, testing, for example.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Sabino Mullane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL 14 press release draft
Следующее
От: Jacob Champion
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert