Re: logical replication restrictions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: logical replication restrictions
Дата
Msg-id 73b06a32-56ab-4056-86ff-e307f3c316f1@www.fastmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logical replication restrictions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: logical replication restrictions  (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>)
Re: logical replication restrictions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Re: logical replication restrictions  ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, at 1:18 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:21 PM Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:
No, I´m talking about that configuration you can have on standby servers
recovery_min_apply_delay = '8h'


oh okay, I think this can be useful in some cases where we want to avoid data loss similar to its use for physical standby. For example, if the user has by mistake truncated the table (or deleted some required data) on the publisher, we can always it from the subscriber if we have such a feature.

Having said that, I am not sure if we can call it a restriction. It is more of a TODO kind of thing. It doesn't sound advisable to me to keep growing the current Restrictions page [1].
It is a new feature. pglogical supports it and it is useful for delayed
secondary server and if, for some business reason, you have to delay when data
is available. There might be other use cases but these are the ones I regularly
heard from customers.

BTW, I have a WIP patch for this feature. I didn't have enough time to post it
because it lacks documentation and tests. I'm planning to do it as soon as this
CF ends.


--
Euler Taveira

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeevan Ladhe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Следующее
От: Greg Sabino Mullane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL 14 press release draft