Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
| От | Marcos Pegoraro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB-JLwZztK7EjqxZy-ot-zOFUm8SNmzJyALs-p7rZG3xfen7Nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em sáb., 12 de jul. de 2025 às 16:07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Indeed. If we put a restriction on this case then we'd just need to
invent a "REALLY CASCADE" option that did the more aggressive thing.
I understand that it's not possible to prevent DROP ... CASCADE from executing. However, the subsequent deletion of constraints, triggers, or functions will affect the behavior of other schemas, so I think it's reasonable to at least explicitly state in the log which objects were deleted due to that command.
regards
Marcos
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: