Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 269091.1752419987@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> writes: > I understand that it's not possible to prevent DROP ... CASCADE from > executing. However, the subsequent deletion of constraints, triggers, or > functions will affect the behavior of other schemas, so I think it's > reasonable to at least explicitly state in the log which objects were > deleted due to that command. [ shrug... ] We do report that. For example: regression=# create table t1(f1 int primary key); CREATE TABLE regression=# create table t2(f2 int references t1); CREATE TABLE regression=# drop table t1; ERROR: cannot drop table t1 because other objects depend on it DETAIL: constraint t2_f2_fkey on table t2 depends on table t1 HINT: Use DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too. regression=# drop table t1 cascade; NOTICE: drop cascades to constraint t2_f2_fkey on table t2 DROP TABLE At default log settings, the ERROR/DETAIL would appear in the log, while the NOTICE would not. Either way, there is plenty of opportunity to observe what will or did get dropped. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: