On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 02:21, Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> wrote:
> I found this too, and also the "one above" part seemed wrong to me as well.
It is valid to pass prevbit as a->nwords * BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD as the
code does "prevbit--;". Maybe it would be less confusing if it were
written as:
* "prevbit" must be less than or equal to "a->nwords * BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD".
The Assert should be using <= rather than <.
David