Re: [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words
| От | Greg Burd |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 266D00F2-4FE3-4352-ABE6-34ECB69BBFFC@getmailspring.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 14 2025, at 10:06 am, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: >> There's a comment saying: >> * "prevbit" must NOT be more than one above the highest possible bit >> that can >> * be set at the Bitmapset at its current size. >> So looks like it's the fault of the calling code and not an issue with >> bms_prev_member(). > > Yeah. But perhaps it'd be reasonable to put in an Assert checking > that? Hey Tom, thanks for chiming in on this one. I had the same idea and sent an updated patch. -greg > Grammar nitpick: comment should be more like "set in the Bitmapset". I found this too, and also the "one above" part seemed wrong to me as well. > > regards, tom lane best. -greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: