On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 17:06, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the patch. I know you just put it together quickly, but I don't
> think you can do that ramp up the way you have. It looks like there's
> a risk of torn reads and torn writes and I'm unsure how much that
> could affect the test results here.
Oops. On closer inspection, I see that memory is per worker, not
global to the scan.