On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:32 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I wonder if a very different approach could make sense here. Presumably this
> wouldn't need to be queried at a very high frequency, right? If so, what about
> storing the latest commit LSN for each backend in PGPROC? That could be
> maintained without a lock/atomics, and should be just about free.
> pg_last_committed_xact() then would have to iterate over all PGPROCs to
> complete the LSN, but that's not too bad for an operation like that. We'd also
> need to maintain a value for all disconnected backends, but that's also not a hot
> path.
One other question on this: if we went with this would you expect a
new function to parallel pg_last_committed_xact()? Or allow the xid
and lsn in the return of pg_last_committed_xact() potentially not to
match (of course xid might also not be present if
track_commit_timestamps isn't on)? Or would you expect the current xid
and timestamp use the new infrastructure also?
Thanks,
James Coleman