Hi,
On 2022-01-18 18:31:42 -0500, James Coleman wrote:
> One other question on this: if we went with this would you expect a
> new function to parallel pg_last_committed_xact()?
I don't think I have an opinion the user interface aspect.
> Or allow the xid and lsn in the return of pg_last_committed_xact()
> potentially not to match (of course xid might also not be present if
> track_commit_timestamps isn't on)? Or would you expect the current xid and
> timestamp use the new infrastructure also?
When you say "current xid", what do you mean?
I think it might make sense to use the new approach for all of these.
Greetings,
Andres Freund