Regexp named capture groups

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joel Jacobson
Тема Regexp named capture groups
Дата
Msg-id CAASwCXeM62AVRCV1OBpG80vyR3rtN4WtjcWFL3FZwitNjmrjFg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Regexp named capture groups
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

Is anyone working on this feature[1] also for PostgreSQL's regex engine?

I'm thinking it could work something like this:

joel=# \df regexp_match
                              List of functions
   Schema   |     Name     | Result data type | Argument data types |  Type
------------+--------------+------------------+---------------------+--------
 pg_catalog | regexp_match | jsonb            | text, text          | normal
 pg_catalog | regexp_match | jsonb            | text, text, text    | normal
(2 rows)

joel=#* SELECT regexp_match_named(
joel(#*    '2018-12-31',
joel(#*    '(?<year>[0-9]{4})-(?<month>[0-9]{2})-(?<day>[0-9]{2})'
joel(#* );
              regexp_match_named
----------------------------------------------
 {"day": "31", "year": "2018", "month": "12"}
(1 row)

I think this feature would be awesome, for the reasons mentioned in [1], quote:

"Referring to capture groups via numbers has several disadvantages:
1. Finding the number of a capture group is a hassle: you have to
count parentheses.
2. You need to see the regular expression if you want to understand
what the groups are for.
3. If you change the order of the capture groups, you also have to
change the matching code."

[1] http://2ality.com/2017/05/regexp-named-capture-groups.html

Best regards,

Joel Jacobson


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0