Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download

On 04/26/2016 07:15 AM, Dave Page wrote:

- The logo linking to OpenSCG's site to offer PostgreSQL services is
the PostgreSQL logo, not the OpenSCG one, which is misleading.

Ugh, you are correct. The way that is presented is very poor. Scott, Jim? We shouldn't have:

"Sponsor Services"
PostgreSQL

and have it go to your services. It needs to be worded better. Perhaps?

Packages sponsored by OpenSCG services? Or something like that.

th distributions use the same non-OSS installer technology.

So why do you make the assertion above? What am I missing?

Well first, this isn't about EDB to me. I was going purely off what was presented which was the 100% open source. As a community we have long agreed that if an Open Source alternative exists, that is the one that gets promoted and it should.

If OpenSCG isn't presenting the solution in the manner described in their announce that either needs to be fixed or, I agree... there is no reason to list them because we don't want to confuse users.