On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:21 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Let me know what you think of attached? I think we can back-patch
> > this patch. What do you think? Does anyone else have an opinion on
> > this patch especially if we see any problem in back-patching this?
>
> The attached looks great!
>
> I was working on HEAD for the patch, but this concern has been an
> issue for quite a long time. We were running into it on 9.6 in
> production, for example. And given how frequently it seems like there
> are large-scale production issues related to auto vacuum, I think any
> amount of back patching we can do to make that footgun less likely
> would be a good thing.
>
Okay, I will commit this tomorrow unless someone has any comments or objections.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com