Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value.
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1LUxB9tS4B0QPrK3hfa6mLMeb95igcWzMs_-LNCPp2J5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value. (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 1:28 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 09:31:36AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:41 PM Jacob Champion > > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > I know it's okay, but I *want* to backpatch, and I would have > > > yesterday except for your email. Does that raise concerns or cause > > > problems in practice? > > > > As far as I understand it shouldn't break community norms either way. > > Also, as per my knowledge there is no clear guidance for such patches. > > It would be good if other committer also shares their view so we can > > also learn and take same action in future. This feature is present > > since PostgreSQL-13 and no real user has reported this problem. It is > > possible that people using this feature are already use to it using > > this feature that it doesn't matter much to them either way. Unless > > someone else responds, I think you can do what you see good to deal > > with this case. > > If it is just a wording improvement, I usually do master only. If it is > inaccurate/unclear/not-understandable, I would backpatch to all > releases. > IIUC, multiple people in this thread felt that it is a wording improvement because current text is unclear. So, if we have to follow what you do, it should be backpatched. Jacob, would you like to take care of this still? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: