On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:39 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have performed cost delay testing on the latest test(I have used
> same script as attahced in [1] and [2].
> vacuum_cost_delay = 10
> vacuum_cost_limit = 2000
>
> Observation: As we have concluded earlier, the delay time is in sync
> with the I/O performed by the worker
> and the total delay (heap + index) is almost the same as the
> non-parallel operation.
>
Thanks for doing this test again. In the attached patch, I have
addressed all the comments and modified a few comments.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com