Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KdLo28mvi39nmjNedOegQN-sDxYWLDPEO_XD2NvEJFeg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 5:53 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-Sep-27, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what makes you say that we can't distinguish the above
> > cases when there is already a separate rule for CURRENT_SCHEMA? I
> > think you can distinguish by tracking the previous objects as we are
> > already doing in the patch. But one thing that is not clear to me is
> > is the reason to introduce a new type PUBLICATIONOBJ_CURRSCHEMA when
> > we use PUBLICATIONOBJ_REL_IN_SCHEMA and PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION to
> > distinguish all cases of CURRENT_SCHEMA. Alvaro might have something
> > in mind for this which is not apparent and that might have caused
> > confusion to you as well?
>
> My issue is what happens if you have a schema that is named
> CURRENT_SCHEMA.  In the normal case where you do ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA
> "CURRENT_SCHEMA" you would end up with a String containing
> "CURRENT_SCHEMA", so how do you distinguish that from ALL TABLES IN
> SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA, which does not refer to the schema named
> "CURRENT_SCHEMA" but in Vignesh's proposal also uses a String containing
> "CURRENT_SCHEMA"?
>
> Now you could say "but who would be stupid enough to do that??!",
>

But it is not allowed to create schema or table with the name
CURRENT_SCHEMA, so not sure if we need to do anything special for it.
However, if we want to handle it as a separate enum then the handling
would be something like:

| ALL TABLES IN_P SCHEMA CURRENT_SCHEMA
                                        {
                                                $$ =
makeNode(PublicationObjSpec);
                                                $$->pubobjtype =
PUBLICATIONOBJ_CURRSCHEMA;
                                        }
...
...
| CURRENT_SCHEMA
                                        {
                                                $$ =
makeNode(PublicationObjSpec);
                                                $$->pubobjtype =
PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION;
                                        }
                ;

Now, during post-processing, the PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION will be
distinguished as CURRENT_SCHEMA because both rangeVar and name will be
NULL. Do you have other ideas to deal with it? Vignesh has already
point in his email [1] why we can't keep pubobjtype as
PUBLICATIONOBJ_CURRSCHEMA in the second case, so I used
PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm06shp%2BALwC2s-dV-S4k2o6bcmXnXGX4ETkoXxKHQfjfA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Fone
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgcrypto support for bcrypt $2b$ hashes
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add jsonlog log_destination for JSON server logs