Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KVqFhdkaajivA0tONN_m0wZE3qFtR_w6VK8tAPLOCToA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Rushabh Lathia
<rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Here is the benchmark number which I got with the latest (v6) patch:
>
> - max_worker_processes = DEFAULT (8)
> - max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 4
> - Cold cache environment is ensured. With every query execution - server is
>   stopped and also OS caches were dropped.
> - The reported values of execution time (in ms) is median of 3 executions.
> - power2 machine with 512GB of RAM
> - With default postgres.conf
>

You haven't mentioned scale factor used in these tests.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016 for postgres community
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)",File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)