On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wonder why you have included a new file for these tests, why can't be
>> these added to existing hash_index.sql.
> tests in hash_index.sql did not cover overflow pages, above tests were for
> mainly for them.
>
The name of file hash_index_split suggests it focus on split. Are the
tests focussed more on overflow pages or on split of hash index?
So I thought having a separate test file can help
> enabling/disabling them in schedule files, when we do not want them running
> as it take slightly high time. If you think otherwise I will reconsider will
> add tests to hash_index.sql.
>
I think you have a point, but not sure if it is worth to add a
separate file. It might be tricky to choose which file to add new
tests for hash_indexes. Anybody else have opinion on this point?
Can you check how much time it takes as compare to btree or brin index tests?
I am facing below diff with your new patch.
***************
*** 1,4 ****
! -- -- Cause some overflow insert and splits. -- CREATE TABLE hash_split_heap (keycol INT);
--- 1,4 ----
! -- -- Cause some overflow insert and splits. -- CREATE TABLE hash_split_heap (keycol INT);
======================================================================
There is an extra space in expected file which is leading to above failure.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com