Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KKXEuy0jvwUohW80fVCdE4X=vz48ZFYLRG1Wj8hNwwqQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.  (Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.  (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the updated patch.
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> Here is the new patch which fixes all of above comments, I changed the
>> design a bit now as below
>>
>> What is it?
>> ===========
>> A pair of bgwrokers one which automatically dumps buffer pool's block
>> info at a given interval and another which loads those block into
>> buffer pool when
>> the server restarts.
>
>
> Are 2 workers required?
>

I think in the new design there is a provision of launching the worker
dynamically to dump the buffers, so there seems to be a need of
separate workers for loading and dumping the buffers.  However, there
is no explanation in the patch or otherwise when and why this needs a
pair of workers.  Also, if the dump interval is greater than zero,
then do we really need to separately register a dynamic worker?


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Beena Emerson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.