Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KJ9sSZ2MFvvKFYnjQeHGQkC2uCBs4Ttv5Rmj2WSpzNQQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:30 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If the patch changes the vacuumdb code as above then isn't it better
> > > to change the vacuumdb docs to reflect the same. See below part of
> > > vacuumdb docs:
> > > -P parallel_degree
> > > --parallel=parallel_degree
> >
> > Changed.
> >
> > > Also, can you please check if your patch works for PG-13 as well
> > > because I think it is better to backpatch it?
> >
> > I'm not sure about backpatching as it is not a critical bug fix. Since
> > the changes are user visible, I think that it's okay to backpatch.
> >
>
> Yes, as it is a user-visible change (though minor) so I thought it
> would be good to backpatch this. Does anyone else have any opinion on
> this?
>

Pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Replace run-time error check with assertion
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings