Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KEjWvTr9voWg83hFR2d6+YFbhhdz0ftLEQ8dmuCaJF4w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing  (AP <ap@zip.com.au>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing  (AP <ap@zip.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:11 PM, AP <ap@zip.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:32:29PM +1000, AP wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:41:24PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > > (On another note, I committed these patches.)
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Seconded. :)
>>
>> Now uploading data with fillfactor of 90. I'll know in 2-3 days
>> if the new patches are successful (earlier if they did not help).
>>
>> I compiled (as apt.postgresql.org does not provide the latest
>> beta3 version for stretch; only sid which has a different perl
>> version) 10~beta3~20170805.2225-1~593.git0d1f98b.
>
> Have gotten success with a dataset that failed before with ff 10.
>
> End result:
>
> mdstash=# select * from pgstathashindex('link_datum_id_idx');
>  version | bucket_pages | overflow_pages | bitmap_pages | unused_pages | live_items | dead_items |   free_percent
> ---------+--------------+----------------+--------------+--------------+------------+------------+------------------
>        4 |     12391325 |        5148912 |          158 |       191643 | 4560007478 |          0 | 1894.29056075982
> (1 row)
>

The free_percent calculation seems to be wrong.  Can you please once
try after recent commit 0b7ba3d6474b8f58e74dba548886df3250805cdf?  I
feel this should be fixed by that commit.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing