Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29653.1502416780@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I don't think I can usefully contribute to this. Could someone else
>> take it?
> If nobody volunteers, you could always resolve this by reverting 1e8a850 and
> successors.
I think you're blaming the victim. Our current theory about the cause
of this is that on Windows, WaitLatchOrSocket cannot be used to wait for
completion of a nonblocking connect() call. That seems pretty broken
independently of whether libpqwalreceiver needs the capability.
In any case, we have a draft patch, so what we should be pressing for
is for somebody to test it. Peter's not in a position to do that
(and neither am I), but anyone who can build from source on Windows
could do so.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: