Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1K5gdzK=X6Y4Jz1pE=JSi3NaxyL_6qXFjSP9pXE5udp2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/12/2015 08:35 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, sorry, I had a moment of brain fade yesterday. However, I think we're a bit under-documented on the pg_basebackup page, regarding both tar mode and tablespace_map (which isn't even mentioned).
>>
>> And there is this which I noticed this morning: the --tablespace-mapping feature of pg_basebackup seems to be quite broken in --format=tar mode - it simply has no effect AFAICT. I assume it was broken before, but we should either fix it (possibly hard) or disallow the combination (which would be a pity).
>>
>> I'm going to go ahead and commit this in the state I have it now, because for the most part these are preexisting deficiencies.
>>
>>
>
>
> One more thing: I think pg_basebackup will now not work in tar mode with pre-9.5 servers, since it will be using an unrecognized option of the BASE_BACKUP protocol command. If so that certainly needs to be documented and release noted.
>

Yes, thats true and I have added the same in docs, updated
patch attached.

As a side note, I think we should have added the same for
--max-rate= option introduced in 9.4.



With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "Bugs" CF?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Back-branch update releases planned for next week