Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+wPGUrHCfx=uXCs29NWiZuu62a8uGngayCONzug1V-hA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Haribabu Kommi
>> <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I didn't find any better names other than the following,
>> >
>> > _bt_get_next_parallel_page
>> > _bt_set_next_parallel_page
>> >
>>
>> I am not sure using *_next_* here will convey the message because for
>> backward scans we set the last page.  I am open to changing the names
>> of functions if committer and or others prefer the names suggested by
>> you.
>
>
> OK. I am fine with it.
> I don't have any other comments on the patch.
>

Thanks for the review.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal