Re: Parallel Seq Scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Дата
Msg-id CAA-aLv7Y35NtWxSDT8Mxu0DYix3LVq2v376rNmMmjn+LfCnsog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1 January 2015 at 17:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we check the number of free bgworkers slots to set the max workers?

The real solution here is that this patch can't throw an error if it's
unable to obtain the desired number of background workers.  It needs
to be able to smoothly degrade to a smaller number of background
workers, or none at all.  I think a lot of this work will fall out
quite naturally if this patch is reworked to use the parallel
mode/parallel context stuff, the latest version of which includes an
example of how to set up a parallel scan in such a manner that it can
run with any number of workers.

+1

That sounds like exactly what's needed.

Thom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Seq Scan