Re: Online verification of checksums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: Online verification of checksums
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcXaw+firw_z-XuOeTfz0OQKoRN3t5LsCV13YP-0-DEoTQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Online verification of checksums  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Online verification of checksums  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:38 PM Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 06:22:52PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > >I am not convinced we need to differentiate further between online and
> > >offline operation, can you explain in more detail which other
> > >differences are ok in online mode and why?
> >
> > For instance the "file/directory was removed" do not look okay at all when
> > offline, even if unlikely. Moreover, the checks hides the error message and
> > is fully silent in this case, while it was not beforehand on the same error
> > when offline.
>
> OK, I kinda see the point here and added that.

Hi,

Just for the information, looks like part of this patch (or at least some
similar code), related to the tests in 002_actions.pl, was committed recently
in 5c99513975, so there are minor conflicts with the master.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cursors with prepared statements
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons