> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 8:37 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> We need to dump the table access method at dump time, otherwise we loose
> that information.
Oh, right. So, something like in the attached patch?
> > As a side note, in a table description I haven't found any mention of which
> > access method is used for this table, probably it's useful to show that with \d+
> > (see the attached patch).
>
> I'm not convinced that's really worth the cost of including it in \d
> (rather than \d+ or such).
Maybe I'm missing the point, but I've meant exactly the same and the patch,
suggested in the previous email, add this info to \d+