psycopg is the new psycopg3?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniele Varrazzo
Тема psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Дата
Msg-id CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Rory Campbell-Lange <rory@campbell-lange.net>)
Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it>)
Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Patrick Starrenburg <patrick.starrenburg@gmail.com>)
Список psycopg
Hello,

I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3 transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each other. Sorry, Fibonacci... 

The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the requirements.txt convention. Dark times...

Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as version number?

Cheers,

-- Daniele 

В списке psycopg по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniele Varrazzo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psycopg3 and adaptation choices
Следующее
От: Rory Campbell-Lange
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?