On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com) wrote:
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> version number?
Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply
"psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2
package.
Rory